最新的设计文档里面对这一块做了一个解释。
Why not use the syntax F like C++ and J***a? When parsing code within a function, such as v := F, at the point of seeing the < it's ambiguous whether we are seeing a type instantiation or an expression using the < operator. This is very difficult to resolve without type information. For example, consider a statement like a, b = w < x, y > (z) Withou…。
上一篇：如何解决Cursor等Agent编码开发轮次多了过后代码库变成屎山的问题？
下一篇：055万吨驱逐舰是不是有些被过于神化了，有没有了解的大佬详细解释一下？
